Listed players
SST2.44▼ -7.58%TIG40.00▲ +3.90%TEAD0.56▲ +3.77%PERI8.50▼ -2.97%TBLA3.23▼ -2.71%INUV0.57▼ -1.74%AV10.06▼ -1.59%GOOGL343.50▲ +1.56%SNAP5.58▼ -1.24%PINS19.26▼ -1.03%MSFT517.53▲ +0.92%PPLI41.28▲ +0.81%IOS32.24▲ +0.44%META728.08▲ +0.30%GDDY97.21▲ +0.24%DV13.49▲ 0.00%MCHX1.29▲ 0.00%
Ticker byClearTrust

Buying traffic · also called ad testing, creative iteration

Creative testing

Creative testing is running several versions of an ad side by side on small budgets to learn which image, headline or angle performs best before spending more.

The short answer, from the The Arbitrage Desk glossary

No one can predict which ad will win, so buyers test. They launch a handful of variations, give each a modest budget, read the results, stop the losers and build new versions of the winners. It is a form of A/B testing applied to the creative.

The arbitrage twist is in what counts as "winning". The ad with the highest CTR or lowest CPC is not necessarily best. Different ads attract different people, and those people earn different amounts on the lander. An ad should be judged on profit per click: revenue per visit minus cost per visit, measured through the tracker down to the ad level.

Good testing needs patience and enough data. Each variant must gather a meaningful number of visits, and the revenue figures used are estimates that may be adjusted later. Testing also has a floor set by policy: every variant must pass ad review and stay truthful, and under RSOC rules its text must be reported with the traffic. Looking at competitors with a spy tool can inspire ideas, but copying them wholesale copies their risks too.

An example

Say ad A costs $0.15 a click and earns $0.18 per visit (profit $0.03). Ad B costs $0.20 and earns $0.28 (profit $0.08). B is the more expensive click and the better ad.

Related terms