Listed players
SST2.44▼ -7.58%TIG40.00▲ +3.90%TEAD0.56▲ +3.77%PERI8.50▼ -2.97%TBLA3.23▼ -2.71%INUV0.57▼ -1.74%AV10.06▼ -1.59%GOOGL343.50▲ +1.56%SNAP5.58▼ -1.24%PINS19.26▼ -1.03%MSFT517.53▲ +0.92%PPLI41.28▲ +0.81%IOS32.24▲ +0.44%META728.08▲ +0.30%GDDY97.21▲ +0.24%DV13.49▲ 0.00%MCHX1.29▲ 0.00%
Ticker byClearTrust

Policy & compliance

Trademark policy

A trademark policy sets out when an ad may use someone else's brand name, and gives brand owners a way to complain when it is misused.

The short answer, from the The Arbitrage Desk glossary

Brand names are valuable keywords. People searching "Brand X login" or "Brand X customer care" have strong commercial intent, so arbitrageurs are tempted to build ads and landers around them.

The rules differ by layer. Google Ads' trademark policy lets advertisers bid on trademarks as keywords, but restricts trademarks in ad text when a competitor uses them or when the use is confusing or deceptive; resellers and informational sites have limited exceptions, and trademark owners can file complaints. Traffic sources such as Meta and native networks have their own intellectual property rules and act on brand complaints. Feed owners can also restrict branded terms passed as forced keywords.

The practical risk for an arbitrageur is impersonation: a creative or lander that looks like the brand's official page. That can break platform policy and unfair competition or consumer law at once, and brand owners tend to complain quickly. Compliant operators avoid logos, official-sounding page names and navigational brand terms, which also overlap with typosquatting concerns.

Related terms

Sources: Google Advertising Policies: Trademarks