Listed players
SST2.44▼ -7.58%TIG40.00▲ +3.90%TEAD0.56▲ +3.77%PERI8.50▼ -2.97%TBLA3.23▼ -2.71%INUV0.57▼ -1.74%AV10.06▼ -1.59%GOOGL343.50▲ +1.56%SNAP5.58▼ -1.24%PINS19.26▼ -1.03%MSFT517.53▲ +0.92%PPLI41.28▲ +0.81%IOS32.24▲ +0.44%META728.08▲ +0.30%GDDY97.21▲ +0.24%DV13.49▲ 0.00%MCHX1.29▲ 0.00%
Ticker byClearTrust

Money & metrics · also called scale, scaling up

Scaling

Scaling is increasing a profitable campaign's ad spend to earn more total profit, ideally without eroding the return that made it worth growing.

The short answer, from the The Arbitrage Desk glossary

Finding a campaign that returns 30% on $100 a day is the easy part. Scaling is the attempt to keep something like that return at $1,000 or $10,000 a day.

Returns usually fall as spend rises, for mechanical reasons. The cheapest, most responsive audience is bought first; reaching more people means paying more per click. Big budget jumps can reset the learning phase. Creatives wear out faster (ad fatigue). On the selling side, a feed cap may limit how many searches are monetised, and a sudden rise in volume attracts closer scrutiny of traffic quality.

There are two routes. Vertical scaling raises budgets on what works, in measured steps. Horizontal scaling duplicates the idea into new countries, keywords, creatives or traffic sources. Both need three things beyond a good ad: cash for the growing cash-flow float, a feed partner told in advance, and monitoring that catches a quality slide before it becomes a clawback. The target when scaling is total profit, not the prettiest percentage.

An example

Say $1,000 a day earns 30% ROI: $300 profit. At $5,000 a day ROI drops to 15%: $750 profit. At $10,000 it drops to 6%: $600. The most profit is at the middle level, not the largest.

Related terms