Listed players
SST2.44▼ -7.58%TIG40.00▲ +3.90%TEAD0.56▲ +3.77%PERI8.50▼ -2.97%TBLA3.23▼ -2.71%INUV0.57▼ -1.74%AV10.06▼ -1.59%GOOGL343.50▲ +1.56%SNAP5.58▼ -1.24%PINS19.26▼ -1.03%MSFT517.53▲ +0.92%PPLI41.28▲ +0.81%IOS32.24▲ +0.44%META728.08▲ +0.30%GDDY97.21▲ +0.24%DV13.49▲ 0.00%MCHX1.29▲ 0.00%
Ticker byClearTrust

Money & metrics · also called revenue per visitor, revenue per landing, RPL

RPV (revenue per visit)

RPV is total revenue divided by the number of visits to the landing page, showing what one arriving visitor is worth on average.

The short answer, from the The Arbitrage Desk glossary

Revenue per visit folds the whole on-site funnel into one number. It already accounts for the visitors who bounce, the ones who click a keyword but no ad, and the price of the ads that do get clicked.

It is the fairest figure to hold against CPC, because both describe the same thing from opposite sides: one visitor, bought and sold. If RPV is above the cost of a visit, the campaign makes money. RPV is therefore also the break-even point cost per visit.

RPV can be broken into three parts: Lander CTR x Ad CTR x revenue per monetised click. That breakdown shows where to work. A weak lander CTR points to the page or the match between ad and keywords. A weak ad CTR points to low coverage or poor keyword choice. A weak click value points to the vertical, the country, or quality discounting. One caution: count visits that actually loaded, not clicks reported by the ad platform, or RPV will look worse than it is.

An example

Say lander CTR is 45%, ad CTR is 60% and each monetised click earns $1.00. RPV = 0.45 x 0.60 x $1.00 = $0.27. Raising lander CTR to 50% lifts RPV to $0.30, an 11% increase with no extra traffic cost.

Related terms