Listed players
SST2.44▼ -7.58%TIG40.00▲ +3.90%TEAD0.56▲ +3.77%PERI8.50▼ -2.97%TBLA3.23▼ -2.71%INUV0.57▼ -1.74%AV10.06▼ -1.59%GOOGL343.50▲ +1.56%SNAP5.58▼ -1.24%PINS19.26▼ -1.03%MSFT517.53▲ +0.92%PPLI41.28▲ +0.81%IOS32.24▲ +0.44%META728.08▲ +0.30%GDDY97.21▲ +0.24%DV13.49▲ 0.00%MCHX1.29▲ 0.00%
Ticker byClearTrust

Fraud & invalid traffic · also called Pixel stuffing, Invisible ads

Hidden ads

Hidden ads are ads loaded where no person can see them, for example in a one-pixel frame or behind other content, yet still counted and sometimes clicked by software.

The short answer, from the The Arbitrage Desk glossary

An ad can be technically "served" without ever being visible. Fraudsters squeeze it into a one-by-one pixel frame (pixel stuffing), place it off-screen, make it transparent or bury it under other elements. Google describes this as ad hiding in its list of invalid activity.

In a search-feed setting the equivalent is loading a results page or related-search unit invisibly in the background of another page, so that ad requests and even clicks are generated without the visitor knowing. The visitor believes they are reading an article or watching a video; a hidden frame elsewhere on the page is running searches.

Warning signs: ad requests from pages where the feed is not supposed to exist, sessions with searches but no visible lander view, clicks with no pointer or touch activity, and frames with zero size.

Feed code is not allowed to be framed or modified, so this is both fraud and a breach of AFS program policies. For honest buyers, the risk is purchasing traffic from sites that monetise this way. Post-click analysis and visibility checks are the usual defences.

Think of it like this

It is a newspaper printing an advert in white ink on white paper, then invoicing the advertiser because the advert was "in the paper".

Related terms

Sources: Google Ad Traffic Quality: invalid activity, Google AdSense Help: AdSense for Search (AFS) policies