Listed players
SST2.44▼ -7.58%TIG40.00▲ +3.90%TEAD0.56▲ +3.77%PERI8.50▼ -2.97%TBLA3.23▼ -2.71%INUV0.57▼ -1.74%AV10.06▼ -1.59%GOOGL343.50▲ +1.56%SNAP5.58▼ -1.24%PINS19.26▼ -1.03%MSFT517.53▲ +0.92%PPLI41.28▲ +0.81%IOS32.24▲ +0.44%META728.08▲ +0.30%GDDY97.21▲ +0.24%DV13.49▲ 0.00%MCHX1.29▲ 0.00%
Ticker byClearTrust

Search feeds · also called search default agreement, distribution deal, default placement deal

Default search deal

A default search deal is an agreement in which a search engine pays a browser, phone maker or app to be its pre-set search engine.

The short answer, from the The Arbitrage Desk glossary

Most people never change the search engine their browser or phone came with. Being the default is therefore enormously valuable, and search engines pay for it. The partner receives a share of the ad revenue from searches made through its product. For the engine, those payments are part of its TAC.

The best-known deals are between Google and large distributors such as Apple and browser makers. They were central to the United States government's antitrust case against Google. In August 2024 the court found Google had broken competition law, and its remedies decision in September 2025 prohibited exclusive search distribution agreements while still allowing Google to pay partners for default placement. It also ordered certain search data to be shared with qualified competitors, while leaving Google's ads data outside that sharing.

Smaller versions of the same deal run throughout search arbitrage. A syndication partner may pay a browser, a software maker or an extension developer to set its search site as default, which is the basis of browser extension search monetisation.

The model is legitimate when users are told clearly and can switch easily. When defaults are changed without consent it becomes search hijacking.

Think of it like this

It is like a drinks company paying a restaurant chain to be the cola served unless the customer asks for something else.

Related terms

Sources: Hughes Hubbard & Reed: Remedies ruling in United States v. Google (search)