Listed players
SST2.44▼ -7.58%TIG40.00▲ +3.90%TEAD0.56▲ +3.77%PERI8.50▼ -2.97%TBLA3.23▼ -2.71%INUV0.57▼ -1.74%AV10.06▼ -1.59%GOOGL343.50▲ +1.56%SNAP5.58▼ -1.24%PINS19.26▼ -1.03%MSFT517.53▲ +0.92%PPLI41.28▲ +0.81%IOS32.24▲ +0.44%META728.08▲ +0.30%GDDY97.21▲ +0.24%DV13.49▲ 0.00%MCHX1.29▲ 0.00%
Ticker byClearTrust

What is the difference between ROI and ROAS in search arbitrage?

ROAS is revenue divided by ad spend. ROI is profit divided by ad spend. If you spend $500 and earn $600, ROAS is 120% and ROI is 20%. A ROAS of 100% means you only got your money back, which is an ROI of zero. Arbitrage teams usually talk in ROI because the margin is what they live on.

Short answer · The Arbitrage Desk

The two are the same information with a different zero point: ROI equals ROAS minus 100 percentage points when ad spend is the only cost counted. Traffic platforms prefer ROAS. Meta's and Google's bidding tools ask for a Target ROAS, so a buyer who wants a 15% return sets a target near 115%, then adds headroom for clawbacks.

Neither figure includes overheads unless you put them in. A campaign at 110% ROAS is losing money once tracker fees, content, salaries and the cost of financing the cash-flow float are counted. A daily profit and loss that includes those lines is more honest than either ratio.

Related questions