Listed players
SST2.44▼ -7.58%TIG40.00▲ +3.90%TEAD0.56▲ +3.77%PERI8.50▼ -2.97%TBLA3.23▼ -2.71%INUV0.57▼ -1.74%AV10.06▼ -1.59%GOOGL343.50▲ +1.56%SNAP5.58▼ -1.24%PINS19.26▼ -1.03%MSFT517.53▲ +0.92%PPLI41.28▲ +0.81%IOS32.24▲ +0.44%META728.08▲ +0.30%GDDY97.21▲ +0.24%DV13.49▲ 0.00%MCHX1.29▲ 0.00%
Ticker byClearTrust

What is the difference between GIVT and SIVT?

GIVT, general invalid traffic, is non-human activity that is easy to identify with lists and simple rules: known crawlers, data-centre addresses, declared bots. SIVT, sophisticated invalid traffic, is built to look like a real person: hijacked devices, residential-proxy bots, manipulated or incentivised human clicks. SIVT needs behavioural analysis and multiple signals to catch.

Short answer · The Arbitrage Desk

Both categories come from the MRC's invalid traffic standards. GIVT filtering is routine. Data-center traffic and self-declared robots are removed with look-ups, and no serious platform bills for them.

SIVT is where arbitrage losses come from. A bot running in a real browser on a residential proxy has a home IP address, a plausible device and human-like timing. Catching it takes device fingerprinting, behaviour analysis and patterns across many visits. When a vendor or traffic source quotes an "IVT rate", ask whether it includes SIVT; a figure covering only GIVT can look reassuring while most of the real problem goes unmeasured.

Related questions